[Previous entry: "geez"] [Next entry: "okay"]
04/18/2004: "FINAL BOUT :O"
music: Coheed & Cambria - Devil In Jersey Citymood: Happy!
Okay, continuing from "'WOGGER' DRAMA"...
What the hell is this? was silly enough to reply to my post. I must add, all his/her 'comebacks' didn't make me change my mind. They go off the subject to other things that are out of the question.
What the hell is this? said:
"The last two that I stated in an email to both Sheila & the Marzana.nu girl, plus in my last blog entry. READ BETTER NEXT TIME."
Since I am neither Sheila or "the Marzana.nu girl" (who actually has a name), I'm not in the position to know what was written in those emails. As for your last blog entry, I didn't care to read that far. As an aside, how can I "read BETTER" if I didn't read it in the first place?
---
I know she has a name, genius. I'm not going to go look it up when half of your friends don't even spell my name right (which isn't even how my real name is spelled), which just makes them look dumb. Anyway, I don't care if you didn't read through the whole thing, but why are you expecting me to know this? I'm not Ms. Cleo here, buddy.
"And, no, mine aren't stolen from Korean sites, since they are credited."
Oh, right. So I could take the possession of another person, without their knowledge or consent, and tell other people whose it is -- but it's O.K., I'm not stealing!
---
Oh right, but no one really has that kind of power in the *real* world! Get out of fantasy and into reality. That has nothing to do with an image, due to the fact an image is third-party.
"Annnd, with your so called 'perfect vision', you forgot the fact the new jamm.jpg image up on the web site has been edited."
Firstly, I don't see how my perfect vision is connected to my memory. Secondly, how can I forget a fact that I don't know to begin with?
---
I'm not Ms. Cleo buddy. Stop trying to sound innocent here. I've got four witnesses who *SAW* the watermark before someone covered it up. But, alas, you won't believe them. But guess what? I'm not giving up until you confess and take the fucking image down.
What the hell are you on about?
---
Obviously what this whole deal is about. o_O
"Which I will prove when I'm done."
Your "proof" is laughable. Well done, you can use Photoshop to edit screenshots!
OMG! BUT I DIDN'T! Too bad I know you did. I think you're just angry I have proof.
Woggers, why *is it* that the jamm.jpg picture has been uploaded on April 17th, when I had proven that it was stolen on April 10th? All of you obviously read this blog entry on April 17th, because that's when you all commented. LOGGED = PWNED.
Take down my image, and stop bitchin' around. I have enough proof here.
And if none of that shit convinces you, why do you *have* to have that OXIDE image up, when I've had it up since October 4th (1.jpg)? Why don't you just scan another one and replace the one you stole from me? Why does that image mean 'so much'?
Btw, if you scan an OXIDE image (scan? --- or should I say steal?), I will still scan the same one from my OXIDE book. (That's the point of hyung-taekim.org --- to have as many images from Hyung-tae Kim, duh.) But I will make sure they're absolutely different in *some* way (or have some type of proof).
This is the last time I'm saying it: TAKE DOWN MY IMAGE.